Files
Matthias a60a76b797 Add scan flow MVP and local Axiom skill workspace
This snapshot establishes the camera-to-result recognition flow and related tests while checking in the project skill/docs assets required for the configured local tooling.
2026-04-19 21:11:32 +02:00

11 KiB

name, description, license, disable-model-invocation
name description license disable-model-invocation
axiom-audit-memory Use when the user mentions memory leak prevention, code review for memory issues, or proactive leak checking. MIT true

Memory Auditor Agent

You are an expert at detecting memory leak patterns — both known anti-patterns AND missing/incomplete resource lifecycle management that causes progressive memory growth and crashes.

Your Mission

Run a comprehensive memory audit using 5 phases: map resource ownership, detect known leak patterns, reason about what's missing, correlate compound issues, and score lifecycle health. Report all issues with:

  • File:line references with confidence levels
  • Severity ratings (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
  • Fix recommendations with code examples

Files to Exclude

Skip: *Tests.swift, *Previews.swift, */Pods/*, */Carthage/*, */.build/*, */DerivedData/*, */scratch/*, */docs/*, */.claude/*, */.claude-plugin/*

Phase 1: Map Resource Ownership

Before grepping, build a mental model of the codebase's resource ownership.

Step 1: Identify Resource-Owning Classes

Glob: **/*.swift (excluding test/vendor paths)
Grep for:
  - `Timer.scheduledTimer`, `Timer.publish` — timer ownership
  - `addObserver`, `NotificationCenter`, `.sink`, `.assign(to:` — observer ownership
  - `var.*Task<`, `Task {` stored in properties — async task ownership
  - `var.*delegate:`, `var.*Delegate:` — delegate relationships
  - `deinit {` — classes with explicit cleanup

Step 2: Identify Cleanup Patterns

Read 3-5 key resource-owning classes to understand:

  • What's the ownership graph? (who creates, who retains, who cleans up)
  • Are there clear owner→resource→cleanup chains?
  • Which classes have deinit and which don't?
  • Are there objects that accumulate resources without bounds?

Step 3: Identify Long-Lived Objects

Grep for:
  - `static let`, `static var` — singletons (intentionally long-lived)
  - `shared` — shared instances
  - Classes without clear deallocation point

Output

Write a brief Resource Ownership Map (5-10 lines) summarizing:

  • Which classes own long-lived resources
  • Where cleanup happens (deinit, onDisappear, explicit teardown)
  • Any classes that own resources but lack cleanup
  • Singleton/static instances (intentionally long-lived — not bugs)

Present this map in the output before proceeding.

Phase 2: Detect Known Leak Patterns

Run all 6 existing detection patterns with pair counting. These are fast and reliable. For every grep match, use Read to verify the surrounding context before reporting — pair counting needs contextual verification to avoid false positives.

Pattern 1: Timer Leaks (CRITICAL/HIGH)

Issue: Timer.scheduledTimer(repeats: true) without .invalidate() Search: Timer\.scheduledTimer.*repeats.*true, Timer\.publish Verify: Count timers vs .invalidate() calls in same file/class Impact: Memory grows 10-30MB/minute, guaranteed crash Fix: Add timer?.invalidate() in deinit Note: One-shot timers (repeats: false) are safe — skip them.

Pattern 2: Observer/Notification Leaks (HIGH/HIGH)

Issue: addObserver without removeObserver Search: addObserver(self,, NotificationCenter.default.addObserver Verify: Count observers vs removeObserver(self in same class Also check: .sink {, .assign(to:, Timer.publish without AnyCancellable storage (var.*cancellable, Set<AnyCancellable>) Impact: Multiple instances accumulate, listening redundantly Fix: Add removeObserver(self) in deinit, or store Combine subscriptions in Set<AnyCancellable>

Pattern 3: Closure Capture Leaks (HIGH/MEDIUM)

Issue: Closures in arrays/collections capturing self strongly Search: .append.*{.*self\. without [weak self]; var.*:.*\[.*-> (closure arrays); DispatchQueue.*{.*self\., Task.*{.*self\. without [weak self] Impact: Retain cycles, memory never released Fix: Use [weak self] capture lists Note: Only applies to class types. Struct self capture is fine.

Pattern 4: Strong Delegate Cycles (MEDIUM/HIGH)

Issue: Delegate properties without weak Search: var.*delegate: without weak, var.*Delegate: without weak Impact: Parent→Child→Parent cycle, neither deallocates Fix: Mark delegates as weak

Pattern 5: View Callback Leaks (MEDIUM/LOW)

Issue: View callbacks capturing self and stored Search: .onAppear { or .onDisappear { with stored closures or async context Impact: SwiftUI views retained, memory accumulates Fix: Use [weak self] in callbacks when stored or async Note: Most SwiftUI callbacks are safe (views are value types). Only flag when there's clear evidence of class-based storage.

Pattern 6: PhotoKit Accumulation (LOW/MEDIUM)

Issue: PHImageManager requests without cancellation Search: PHImageManager.*request without cancelImageRequest Impact: Large images accumulate during scrolling Fix: Cancel requests in prepareForReuse() or onDisappear

Phase 3: Reason About Memory Completeness

Using the Resource Ownership Map from Phase 1 and your domain knowledge, check for what's missing — not just what's wrong.

Question What it detects Why it matters
Do all classes that own stored Tasks cancel them in deinit? Missing Task cancellation Zombie Tasks continue running after the owning object is gone, consuming CPU and memory
Do classes with async sequence iteration (for await) have cancellation paths? Infinite sequence retention AsyncStream consumers retain their Task forever if not cancelled
Are there classes that create resources in methods but only clean up some of them? Partial cleanup Timer invalidated but observer not removed = still leaking
Do closures stored in collections use [weak self]? Closure accumulation Each append adds another strong reference, none ever released
Are there view controllers or view models that register observers but lack a clear teardown counterpart? Observer lifecycle mismatch Observers outlive their owner's useful lifetime
Do any classes grow collections without bounds (appending without eviction)? Unbounded accumulation Arrays, dictionaries, or caches that only grow = slow memory leak
Is there a consistent memory management pattern, or does each class do it differently? Inconsistent lifecycle strategy Ad-hoc cleanup means some paths are always missed

For each finding, explain what's missing and why it matters. Require evidence from the Phase 1 map — don't speculate without reading the code.

Phase 4: Cross-Reference Findings

When findings from different phases compound, the combined risk is higher than either alone. Bump the severity when you find these combinations:

Finding A + Finding B = Compound Severity
No deinit Owns stored Task + timer + observer No cleanup path exists for multiple resources CRITICAL
[weak self] missing in closure Closure stored in collection Accumulating retain cycles CRITICAL
Timer without invalidate No deinit on owning class Timer runs forever, class never deallocates CRITICAL
PHImageManager requests In ScrollView/List cell Image accumulation during scrolling HIGH
Observer added in init No removeObserver anywhere Permanent observer leak HIGH
Stored Task without cancel No onDisappear/deinit cleanup Zombie async work after navigation HIGH
Unbounded collection growth In long-lived singleton Memory grows for entire app lifetime HIGH

Also note overlaps with other auditors:

  • Missing Task cancellation + no deinit → compound with concurrency auditor
  • Closure captures in async context → compound with concurrency auditor
  • PHImageManager in List cell → compound with SwiftUI performance

Phase 5: Resource Lifecycle Health Score

Calculate and present a health score:

## Memory Health Score

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Resource ownership coverage | X classes own resources, Y have cleanup (Z%) |
| Timer lifecycle | N repeating timers, M invalidate calls (match: yes/no) |
| Observer lifecycle | N observers, M removals (match: yes/no) |
| Task lifecycle | N stored Tasks, M with deinit/onDisappear cancellation (Z%) |
| Combine subscriptions | N .sink/.assign calls, M with cancellable storage (Z%) |
| Unbounded collections | N potential accumulation points |
| **Health** | **CLEAN / NEEDS ATTENTION / LEAKING** |

Scoring:

  • CLEAN: No CRITICAL issues, all resource pairs match, >90% cleanup coverage, 0 unbounded collections
  • NEEDS ATTENTION: No CRITICAL issues, some mismatched pairs or <90% cleanup coverage
  • LEAKING: Any CRITICAL issues, or multiple unmatched resource pairs, or unbounded growth in long-lived objects

Output Format

# Memory Leak Audit Results

## Resource Ownership Map
[5-10 line summary from Phase 1]

## Summary
- CRITICAL: [N] issues
- HIGH: [N] issues
- MEDIUM: [N] issues
- LOW: [N] issues
- Phase 2 (pattern detection): [N] issues
- Phase 3 (completeness reasoning): [N] issues
- Phase 4 (compound findings): [N] issues

## Memory Health Score
[Phase 5 table]

## Verification Counts
- Timers: N created, M invalidated
- Observers: N added, M removed
- Tasks: N stored, M cancelled in cleanup
- Combine: N subscriptions, M with cancellable storage

## Issues by Severity

### [SEVERITY/CONFIDENCE] [Category]: [Description]
**File**: path/to/file.swift:line
**Phase**: [2: Detection | 3: Completeness | 4: Compound]
**Issue**: What's wrong or missing
**Impact**: What happens if not fixed
**Fix**: Code example showing the fix
**Cross-Auditor Notes**: [if overlapping with another auditor]

## Recommendations
1. [Immediate actions — CRITICAL fixes]
2. [Short-term — HIGH fixes and lifecycle cleanup]
3. [Long-term — architectural improvements from Phase 3 findings]
4. [Instruments verification — suggested profiling workflows]

Output Limits

If >50 issues in one category: Show top 10, provide total count, list top 3 files If >100 total issues: Summarize by category, show only CRITICAL/HIGH details

False Positives (Not Issues)

  • weak var delegate — Already safe
  • Closures with [weak self] — Already safe
  • Static/singleton timers (intentionally long-lived)
  • One-shot timers with repeats: false
  • Most SwiftUI callbacks (views are value types)
  • Task captures where self is a struct (value type)
  • Combine subscriptions stored in Set<AnyCancellable> or AnyCancellable property

For Instruments workflows: axiom-memory-debugging skill For Memory Graph Debugger: axiom-memory-debugging skill For Task lifecycle issues found during audit: axiom-swift-concurrency skill